RSS:
Publications
Comments

Dark Reel (2008)

darkreel

  • Directed by Josh Eisenstadt
  • Written by Aaron Pope
  • Starring
    • Lance Henriksen
    • Edward Furlong
    • Tiffany Shepis
    • Tony Todd
    • Jeffrey Vincent Parise

The first scene of Dark Reel exemplifies the strengths and weaknesses of the movie as a whole:

Set during the ’50s and shot in black and white, a blonde named Scarlett May (Alexandra Holden) drinks alone at a Hollywood bar. A well-dressed young man (Daniel Wisler) enters and makes some small talk with her, although she’s not very forthcoming. That changes, though, when he produces a card and says he’s with Spotlight National Films, since she is, naturally, an actress. He offers her a screentest right then, and they go back at night to the studio lot. He puts her in a spotlight and asks her to “be yourself.” Then he disappears. She looks around, uncertain — and suddenly he comes from behind her with a huge knife. Blood is spattered; limbs are severed.

The scenes in the bar encapsulate a decadent Hollywood underside in the ’50s. The screentest on the empty soundstage, with the blonde Scarlett thrown into high contrast by the lights against an invisible black interior, is a striking visual. The performances are charming and low-key. And the display of rubbery detached limbs, shaken so that syrupy blood will drip from them for the benefit of the camera, is cheap-looking and artless, like a backyard slasher movie.

That’s how Dark Reel is all the way through: Good filmmaking and fine performances sabotaged regularly by ham-handed and ill-thought-out scenes and subplots.

darkreel-a
“When you wish upon a staaaar…”

In the present, B-movie film fan Adam (Edward Furlong) lives in a small apartment decorated with scream queen posters. If you’ve seen Furlong recently, since he outgrew being the juvenile John Connor in Terminator 2 (1991), you know that the once-expected leading-man good looks have instead become baggy eyes, reedy voice, and slouching shoulders — a perfect fit for this role. Adam came to Hollywood from Virginia, pursuing a star-struck girlfriend who now wants no part of him. After a final attempt to connect with her, he enters a “Win a walk-on role in a horror movie!” contest on a whim.

The contest is being sponsored by Spotlight National Films — yes, they’re still around — which is run by Connor Pritchett (the ever enjoyable Lance Henriksen), who comes across as a combination of Rober Corman, Charles Band, and my boss. (Don’t tell my boss.) He’s a demanding, humorless S.O.B. Who’s getting tired of all the swimming it takes to keep the sharks at bay. Dark Reel is set in an alternate universe where the kind of quickie productions that Spotlight National specializes in are still considered part (though a disreputable part) of the Hollywood establishment, instead of the overlapping but completely separate industry that are treated as today, only slightly more visible to Variety and The Hollywood Reporter than porn.

The current production that Pritchett is stressing over is Pirate Wench, a vaguely sexy (female pirates wore high heels?) actioner shot entirely on a replica pirate ship moored at the harbor. The star is Cassie Blue (Tiffany Shepis), scream queen supreme; think of the real Tiffany Shepis, then imagine that in this alternate universe she has real prospects. (That’s not a slam. In every feature in which I’ve seen her, Shepis is a consummate professional. But the Hollywood of the Roger Corman heyday is gone; actors like Jack Nicholson can’t start at the low end of the stardom spectrum and work their way up. Nowadays, the actors and actresses who start in the shot-on-video D2DVD arena stay there; A-listers come down, as demonstrated by Henriksen and Furlong, but Z-listers don’t come up, especially with actresses. Sorry to disillusion all of your waiting for Debbie Rochon and Tina Krause to get their big break; they can only continue to be big fish in a very small, very cheap pond, ability be damned.)

darkreel-b
B-movie starlets go wild over guys who look like Al Gore. Really.

This is naturally the production on which Adam has his one-line role, and he’s a starstruck fanboy when introduced to all of them, especially Cassie. For her part, Cassie is friendly and sociable — certainly more than a sex-symbol scream queen would be to a slightly creepy fanboy. I did mention that this is an alternate universe, right? (I have to wonder what the on-set dynamics were like. Shepis is getting to be a biggish fish in a small pond, but Furlong’s feature was budgeted at $100 million. And Henriksen’s had the kind of career that most Hollywooders would kill for, even with his almost-complete descent from theatricals to DTV features these days. How hard did Shepis find it to stay in character as the “movie star” when her co-stars had been for-real movie stars?)

In fact, being the down-to-earth girl she is, she invites him to the after-shoot get-together at a local bar, and they proceed to hit it off. Is Cassie going to become an item with a fanboy? Most of the rest of the cast and crew thinks she will, and turn their noses up at the possibility. Not that Furlong plays his Adam persona as the stereotypical socially-skilless loser, but… well, look at him.

Oh, right, horror movie. There is some horror in here, and it has nothing to do with the blurring of Hollywood class distinctions. Lorraine, one of the Pirate Wench wenches, returns to her trailer and is confronted by someone in a dark overcoat, a long blonde wig, and a skull-like mask; he tosses her to the floor and slashes her throat. It’s a well-done effect, especially since low-budget throat-slashing is usually so poorly done.

darkreel-c
In Hollywood, even the masked killers have perfectly-applied lipstick.

So. We’ve got a movie production, we’ve got a mysterious killer, and we’ve got an outsider on set who naturally attracts suspicion (especially after his part gets bumped up in the emergency rewrite after Lorraine’s death), both from the director Derek (Jeffrey Vincent Parise), who wants to get into Cassie’s pants himself, and from the two homicide detectives Shields and LaRue (Tony Todd [!] and Rena Riffel, and reproduce all my comments above about sliding down the ladder of production quality for Todd’s benefit). Who could be murdering the cast members? Why? And what does all of this have to do with the murder of Scarlett May?

Because it does, you know. Adam notices early on that there are lost-dog-style flyers posted on telephone poles in the area which only feature an action photo of Scarlett and one word “Despair,” “Scandal,” “Vanity,” etc. And then…

Up to now, everything in this movie has been competent and sometimes even commendable. But then Adam starts seeing the ghost of Scarlett May during a dailies screening, though she’s invisible to all others. This is about an hour into the movie — in other words, way to damned late to start including a supernatural angle. More than anything, the sudden appearance of Scarlett’s ghost seems like evidence of a desperate screenwriter who realizes that none of the characters have any reason to find and follow the trail to the “real” murderer without an intervention of fiat. (Or maybe screenwriter Aaron Pope, who was also script supervisor on the similarly-themed Cut Throat (2002), was trying to find any way to distinguish the two movies.)

darkreel-d
Sometimes, being the go-to guy for Bigfoot movies isn’t consolation enough.

By the end, the wheels have coming flying off this train, thanks to one of my least favorite slasher movie cliches: The killer who turns out to have been a character who has acted well-adjusted and in control up until now, but becomes a raving madman when he strips off the mask and the Scooby-Doo gang gasps, “It’s you!” And that’s a pity, because the first half of the movie was well set-up and plausible, at least by the terms of the alternate universe in which it’s set.

In fact, once the ghost appears, even the story elements not touched by the supernatural get less and less justifiable. It’s eventually revealed that Scarlett’s killer was, of course, Connor Pritchett. But he picked her at random, carved her up calmly on camera — and then apparently never killed again. If you’re looking for something a lot less plausible than a ghost showing up in the middle of a screening and making vague plot-necessary gestures to the one person almost powerless to take any action, this is it.

Acting is uniformly good — uniformly, except for the glaring exception of Jake Grace as Rhett Johnson, the male lead in Pirate Wench: even when the camera’s off, he acts like an amalgam of Clark Gable, the Scarlet Pimpernel, and Captain Jack Sparrow. He’s so over the top that everyone else has to dial it back to keep this movie from becoming a spoof.

darkreel-e
How do you get the star and the director to stop sniping at each other? THAT’S how.

In an odd sense, Furlong’s and Shepis’ good performances work against them. Furlong does great as a somewhat-introverted-but-not-socially-crippled outside to “the business” (the way in which he isn’t instantly cowed by the attention of the detectives is a refreshing touch), and Shepis works well as a B-movie star who hasn’t adopted the de rigueur bitchiness of most of her peers. That said, we can still see no way in hell that these two would get together and get groiny, which they proceed to do.

The highlight/lowlight award goes to the scene in which Detective Shields interviews/interrogates Pritchett after two murders (again, a scene after the ghost first appears, and suddenly what was once an intelligent script suddenly concentrates on dunderheaded moves). Here are Lance Henriksen and Tony Todd, two actors far above their pay scale, and all the script hands them to do is an inane circumlocution as the two genteelly try to establish Alpha Male status. Such a waste.

So putting Dark Reel in context among it’s peers: Better than Cut Throat, but nowhere near as fun as Gingerdead Man 2 (2008).

Some Notable Totables:

  • body count: 8
  • breasts: 2
  • explosions: 0
  • ominous thunderstorms: 0
  • actors who’ve appeared on Star Trek: 2
    • Tony Todd (Detective Shields) played Worf’s brother Kurn in several episodes of TNG and DS9, the adult Jake Sisco in the DS9 episode “The Visitor,” and “Alpha Hirogen” in the Voyager episode “Prey”
    • Tracey Walter (“Roy White,” the paparazzi) played “Kayron” on the TNG episode “The Last Outpost” and “Berik” in the TNG episode “Rascals”

darkreelpound


14 Comments to Dark Reel (2008)

  1. November 19, 2009 at | Permalink

    instead of the overlapping but completely separate industry that are treated as today, only slightly more visible to Variety and The Hollywood Reporter than porn.

    How so? I mean, yeah, sure, that kind of D2DVD production won’t get mentioned in the trade papers, but that’s not surprising; with all the independent movies that are being made nowadays they simply couldn’t devote space to them all, and it’s natural they’d focus on the movies that actually go to the theaters and actually have budgets. But I certainly haven’t noticed any general attitude in the industry that they’re a separate industry, or that there’s any stigma attached to having been involved in them. If today’s ultra-low-budget movies don’t have the visibility of those of Corman’s heyday, it’s probably mostly just because, with the rise of digital editing and cheap home recording equipment, there are just so many movies being made nowadays that the lower end tends to get lost in the crowd.

    As to why today’s D2DVD actors aren’t making it big… well, if that’s true, I certainly don’t think it’s because having worked on such a movie is any sort of mark against them; I’ve seen no indication of any such attitude, and on the contrary it seems that casting professionals prefer any experience to no experience (well, except for porn… that does count against you). It could be, again, just an effect of the greater volume of productions; it’s harder for these actors to get casting directors’ attention, since casting directors aren’t ever likely to see the movies they were in. It could be that having carved out a niche for themselves in D2DVD movies, the actors aren’t interested in trying to branch out… which is actually less improbable than it may sound, given the situation with the unions; to even get an audition for a studio film, you generally have to be a member of SAG, but being in SAG may effectively disqualify you from acting in a low-budget non-union production, so an actor who’s getting steady work in non-union productions may not want to try to get into SAG and risk losing their proven meal ticket for a slim chance at something bigger. Or it could be any of a number of other explanations.

  2. November 19, 2009 at | Permalink

    (Though admittedly the union can’t have anything to do with it in this case, since if actors like Lance Henriksen and Edward Furlong were in this movie it must have been a SAG production, which means that Tiffany Shepis would have to be SAG to have been in it. (There is an Ultra-Low-Budget SAG Contract that allows both SAG and non-union actors to work on the same project, but that’s only available for movies with a budget of less than $200,000, and according to the IMDb this movie had an estimated budget of $1 million.))

  3. November 19, 2009 at | Permalink

    Do. We’ve got a movie production, we’ve got a mysterious killer, and we’ve got an outsider on set who naturally attracts suspicion …

    “So”, perhaps?

    Sorry, I’m compulsive.

  4. November 19, 2009 at | Permalink

    Huh. I don’t know who it is that told you that, or what their experience is, but I still don’t think that’s true. I’ve known actors who have been in both ultra-low-budget productions and big studio shows and movies, and they list their credits in both on their resumes. There are places that hold workshops where they invite casting directors and filmmakers to talk to actors (who pay a fee to attend); some major casting directors come to these workshops… but another frequent, and popular, guest is low-budget D2DVD producer Patrick Durham. They’re certainly all considered parts of the same industry.

    That being in in low-budget productions actually makes it harder to get A-list parts flies in the face of everything I’ve heard from acting teachers, casting directors, and other professionals. The truth is, it’s very hard for anyone to break into doing big, A-list parts. I’m sure the vast majority of actors who’ve done lots of B-movie work have never broken into A-list stuff, because the vast majority of actors in general have never broken into A-list stuff—maybe having done lots of B-list work doesn’t help that much, but I seriously can’t believe it’s actually an impediment; that goes against everything I’ve seen and been taught. That someone with lots of low-budget credits is worse off than someone who’s only done community theater and a walk-on role at Law and Order… no. I’m sorry, but that’s just wrong. Casting directors want to see credits, to the extent that actors without many other credits even list student films on their resumes. There’s no way that having lots of B-movie credits would actually be a hindrance.

    In Tiffany Shepis’ case, for what it’s worth, her IMDb page mentions the following quote: “I go after parts in horror films ’cause I have the most fun shooting them. I mean, wouldn’t you rather be covered in blood fighting some fucker with an axe than doing some lame romantic comedy?” So it’s entirely possible that she’s continuing to work in such movies out of a choice on her part. Certainly, according to her IMDb credits, she’s doing an impressive number of movies per year (twenty-one movies in 2009? Yow!), enough that, low-budget or not, she’s definitely making a decent living.

  5. November 19, 2009 at | Permalink

    (Though actually the “fresh-faced starlet who’s only done community theater and a walk-on role on Law & Order” is something of a mythical beast to begin with. Law & Order is a big enough show that an actor is unlikely to get even a walk-on role on it without having had some previous credits… even if those previous credits have been in student films or, yes, B-movies.)

  6. November 19, 2009 at | Permalink

    Well, yes, someone with slim credits in A-list stuff comes out ahead of someone with only B-list credits; I’m not arguing about that. But someone with lots of B-list credits is still ahead of someone with no credits… and someone with lots of B-list credits and a handful of credits in A-list stuff is still ahead of someone with a handful of credits in A-list stuff and nothing else. Credits in major studio shows and movies count for much more than B-list credits, but that doesn’t mean B-list credits actually count against you. I’ve been in a couple of D2DVD movies myself, and neither my agent nor any of my acting coaches has ever suggesting leaving them off my résumé.

    I mean, heck, unless the CD is a B-movie aficionado herself, how is she even going to know what kind of movies your credits are from? If she doesn’t recognize the title (and she almost certainly won’t—there are enough independent movies coming out that nobody can possibly keep track of them all), for all she knows they could be any kind of independent movie, or even student films. Okay, granted, some titles, like “Chainsaw Cheerleaders”, do sort of give away what kind of movies they are, but even for those, I’ve never seen or heard anything to imply that having been in such a movie actually prejudices casting directors against you. On the contrary, in general the more credits the better; once you have been in enough A-list stuff you can start taking the lesser stuff off the résumé, but until then it’s important to let casting directors know you’ve been working.

    Seriously, I don’t know who your sources are here, but I’m still convinced you’ve been seriously misinformed on this matter. But I suppose there’s no point in arguing at length about this; maybe we can just agree to disagree.

  7. sandra's Gravatar sandra
    November 21, 2009 at | Permalink

    I suppose The 400 was a drawing-room comedy about New York socialites and tanked at the box office.

  8. November 21, 2009 at | Permalink

    But could they afford to show the same ten extras running by the camera forty times?

  9. IL's Gravatar IL
    November 28, 2009 at | Permalink

    More than anything, the sudden appearance of Scarlett’s ghost seems like evidence of a desperate screenwriter who realizes that none of the characters have any reason to find and follow the trail to the “real” murderer without an intervention of fiat.

    If the screenwriter had been a better writer, maybe he could have run with that. “On second thought, let’s not investigate her murder. I mean, it’s not like any of us are really sorry she’s gone, right?”

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree