<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dark Reel (2008)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/archives/dark-reel-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/archives/dark-reel-2008/</link>
	<description>Sci-Fi, Horror, and General Whoopass</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:13:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IL</title>
		<link>http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/archives/dark-reel-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/?p=3860#comment-854</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;More than anything, the sudden appearance of Scarlett’s ghost seems like evidence of a desperate screenwriter who realizes that none of the characters have any reason to find and follow the trail to the “real” murderer without an intervention of fiat.&lt;/i&gt;

If the screenwriter had been a better writer, maybe he could have run with that. &quot;On second thought, let&#039;s &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; investigate her murder. I mean, it&#039;s not like any of us are really sorry she&#039;s gone, right?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>More than anything, the sudden appearance of Scarlett’s ghost seems like evidence of a desperate screenwriter who realizes that none of the characters have any reason to find and follow the trail to the “real” murderer without an intervention of fiat.</i></p>
<p>If the screenwriter had been a better writer, maybe he could have run with that. &#8220;On second thought, let&#8217;s <i>not</i> investigate her murder. I mean, it&#8217;s not like any of us are really sorry she&#8217;s gone, right?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Shumate</title>
		<link>http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/archives/dark-reel-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Shumate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/?p=3860#comment-844</guid>
		<description>I see you&#039;ll go far in this industry, Read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you&#8217;ll go far in this industry, Read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Read MacGuirtose</title>
		<link>http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/archives/dark-reel-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Read MacGuirtose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/?p=3860#comment-843</guid>
		<description>But could they afford to show the same ten extras running by the  camera forty times?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But could they afford to show the same ten extras running by the  camera forty times?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Shumate</title>
		<link>http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/archives/dark-reel-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Shumate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/?p=3860#comment-842</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s especially deceptive because Spotlight couldn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;afford&lt;/i&gt; 400 cast members, even extras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s especially deceptive because Spotlight couldn&#8217;t <i>afford</i> 400 cast members, even extras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/archives/dark-reel-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/?p=3860#comment-840</guid>
		<description>I suppose The 400 was a drawing-room comedy about New York socialites and tanked at the box office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose The 400 was a drawing-room comedy about New York socialites and tanked at the box office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Shumate</title>
		<link>http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/archives/dark-reel-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Shumate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/?p=3860#comment-838</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s wussy talk.  Cage match!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s wussy talk.  Cage match!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Read MacGuirtose</title>
		<link>http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/archives/dark-reel-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>Read MacGuirtose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/?p=3860#comment-837</guid>
		<description>Well, yes, someone with slim credits in A-list stuff comes out ahead of someone with only B-list credits; I&#039;m not arguing about that.  But someone with lots of B-list credits is still ahead of someone with &lt;I&gt;no&lt;/I&gt; credits... and someone with lots of B-list credits and a handful of credits in A-list stuff is still ahead of someone with a handful of credits in A-list stuff and nothing else.  Credits in major studio shows and movies count for much more than B-list credits, but that doesn&#039;t mean B-list credits actually count &lt;I&gt;against&lt;/I&gt; you.   I&#039;ve been in a couple of D2DVD movies myself, and neither my agent nor any of my acting coaches has ever suggesting leaving them off my r&#233;sum&#233;.  

I mean, heck, unless the CD is a B-movie aficionado herself, how is she even going to know what kind of movies your credits are from?  If she doesn&#039;t recognize the title (and she almost certainly won&#039;t&#8212;there are enough independent movies coming out that nobody can possibly keep track of them all), for all she knows they could be any kind of independent movie, or even student films.  Okay, granted, some titles, like &quot;Chainsaw Cheerleaders&quot;, do sort of give away what kind of movies they are, but even for those, I&#039;ve never seen or heard anything to imply that having been in such a movie actually prejudices casting directors &lt;I&gt;against&lt;/I&gt; you.  On the contrary, in general the more credits the better; once you &lt;I&gt;have&lt;/I&gt; been in enough A-list stuff you can start taking the lesser stuff off the r&#233;sum&#233;, but until then it&#039;s important to let casting directors know you&#039;ve been working.

Seriously, I don&#039;t know who your sources are here, but I&#039;m still convinced you&#039;ve been seriously misinformed on this matter.  But I suppose there&#039;s no point in arguing at length about this; maybe we can just agree to disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yes, someone with slim credits in A-list stuff comes out ahead of someone with only B-list credits; I&#8217;m not arguing about that.  But someone with lots of B-list credits is still ahead of someone with <i>no</i> credits&#8230; and someone with lots of B-list credits and a handful of credits in A-list stuff is still ahead of someone with a handful of credits in A-list stuff and nothing else.  Credits in major studio shows and movies count for much more than B-list credits, but that doesn&#8217;t mean B-list credits actually count <i>against</i> you.   I&#8217;ve been in a couple of D2DVD movies myself, and neither my agent nor any of my acting coaches has ever suggesting leaving them off my r&eacute;sum&eacute;.  </p>
<p>I mean, heck, unless the CD is a B-movie aficionado herself, how is she even going to know what kind of movies your credits are from?  If she doesn&#8217;t recognize the title (and she almost certainly won&#8217;t&mdash;there are enough independent movies coming out that nobody can possibly keep track of them all), for all she knows they could be any kind of independent movie, or even student films.  Okay, granted, some titles, like &#8220;Chainsaw Cheerleaders&#8221;, do sort of give away what kind of movies they are, but even for those, I&#8217;ve never seen or heard anything to imply that having been in such a movie actually prejudices casting directors <i>against</i> you.  On the contrary, in general the more credits the better; once you <i>have</i> been in enough A-list stuff you can start taking the lesser stuff off the r&eacute;sum&eacute;, but until then it&#8217;s important to let casting directors know you&#8217;ve been working.</p>
<p>Seriously, I don&#8217;t know who your sources are here, but I&#8217;m still convinced you&#8217;ve been seriously misinformed on this matter.  But I suppose there&#8217;s no point in arguing at length about this; maybe we can just agree to disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Shumate</title>
		<link>http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/archives/dark-reel-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Shumate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/?p=3860#comment-836</guid>
		<description>Well, I picked Law &amp; Order out of a hat, the point being that an actor or (especially) an actress with slim-but-&quot;legitimate&quot; stuff on their resume comes out ahead of the one with plenty of credits in the denigrated trenches.  It&#039;s a prejudicial thing, and I&#039;m trusting my sources on this one.  (Honestly, how many Hollywood stars or pseudo-stars can you think of in the last 20 years who&#039;ve come up from schlock?  As I said, Jack Nicholson&#039;s coming up from the Corman sausage factory is a memory of a different paradigm.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I picked Law &#038; Order out of a hat, the point being that an actor or (especially) an actress with slim-but-&#8221;legitimate&#8221; stuff on their resume comes out ahead of the one with plenty of credits in the denigrated trenches.  It&#8217;s a prejudicial thing, and I&#8217;m trusting my sources on this one.  (Honestly, how many Hollywood stars or pseudo-stars can you think of in the last 20 years who&#8217;ve come up from schlock?  As I said, Jack Nicholson&#8217;s coming up from the Corman sausage factory is a memory of a different paradigm.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Read MacGuirtose</title>
		<link>http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/archives/dark-reel-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Read MacGuirtose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/?p=3860#comment-835</guid>
		<description>(Though actually the &quot;fresh-faced starlet who’s only done community theater and a walk-on role on &lt;I&gt;Law &amp; Order&lt;/I&gt;&quot; is something of a mythical beast to begin with.  &lt;I&gt;Law &amp; Order&lt;/I&gt; is a big enough show that an actor is unlikely to get even a walk-on role on it without having had some previous credits... even if those previous credits have been in student films or, yes, B-movies.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Though actually the &#8220;fresh-faced starlet who’s only done community theater and a walk-on role on <i>Law &amp; Order</i>&#8221; is something of a mythical beast to begin with.  <i>Law &amp; Order</i> is a big enough show that an actor is unlikely to get even a walk-on role on it without having had some previous credits&#8230; even if those previous credits have been in student films or, yes, B-movies.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Read MacGuirtose</title>
		<link>http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/archives/dark-reel-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>Read MacGuirtose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/?p=3860#comment-834</guid>
		<description>Huh.  I don&#039;t know who it is that told you that, or what their experience is, but I still don&#039;t think that&#039;s true.  I&#039;ve known actors who have been in both ultra-low-budget productions and big studio shows and movies, and they list their credits in both on their resumes.  There are places that hold workshops where they invite casting directors and filmmakers to talk to actors (who pay a fee to attend); some major casting directors come to these workshops... but another frequent, and popular, guest is low-budget D2DVD producer &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1189201/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Patrick Durham&lt;/A&gt;.  They&#039;re certainly all considered parts of the same industry.

That being in in low-budget productions actually makes it &lt;I&gt;harder&lt;/I&gt; to get A-list parts flies in the face of everything I&#039;ve heard from acting teachers, casting directors, and other professionals.  The truth is, it&#039;s very hard for &lt;I&gt;anyone&lt;/I&gt; to break into doing big, A-list parts.  I&#039;m sure the vast majority of actors who&#039;ve done lots of B-movie work have never broken into A-list stuff, because the vast majority of actors &lt;I&gt;in general&lt;/I&gt; have never broken into A-list stuff&#8212;maybe having done lots of B-list work doesn&#039;t help that much, but I seriously can&#039;t believe it&#039;s actually an impediment; that goes against everything I&#039;ve seen and been taught.  That someone with lots of low-budget credits is worse off than someone who&#039;s only done community theater and a walk-on role at &lt;I&gt;Law and Order&lt;/I&gt;... no.  I&#039;m sorry, but that&#039;s just wrong.  Casting directors want to see credits, to the extent that actors without many other credits even list &lt;I&gt;student films&lt;/I&gt; on their resumes.  There&#039;s no way that having lots of B-movie credits would actually be a hindrance.

In Tiffany Shepis&#039; case, for what it&#039;s worth, her IMDb page mentions the following quote: &quot;I go after parts in horror films &#039;cause I have the most fun shooting them. I mean, wouldn&#039;t you rather be covered in blood fighting some fucker with an axe than doing some lame romantic comedy?&quot;  So it&#039;s entirely possible that she&#039;s continuing to work in such movies out of a choice on her part.  Certainly, according to her IMDb credits, she&#039;s doing an impressive number of movies per year (twenty-one movies in 2009?  Yow!), enough that, low-budget or not, she&#039;s definitely making a decent living.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh.  I don&#8217;t know who it is that told you that, or what their experience is, but I still don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s true.  I&#8217;ve known actors who have been in both ultra-low-budget productions and big studio shows and movies, and they list their credits in both on their resumes.  There are places that hold workshops where they invite casting directors and filmmakers to talk to actors (who pay a fee to attend); some major casting directors come to these workshops&#8230; but another frequent, and popular, guest is low-budget D2DVD producer <a HREF="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1189201/" rel="nofollow">Patrick Durham</a>.  They&#8217;re certainly all considered parts of the same industry.</p>
<p>That being in in low-budget productions actually makes it <i>harder</i> to get A-list parts flies in the face of everything I&#8217;ve heard from acting teachers, casting directors, and other professionals.  The truth is, it&#8217;s very hard for <i>anyone</i> to break into doing big, A-list parts.  I&#8217;m sure the vast majority of actors who&#8217;ve done lots of B-movie work have never broken into A-list stuff, because the vast majority of actors <i>in general</i> have never broken into A-list stuff&mdash;maybe having done lots of B-list work doesn&#8217;t help that much, but I seriously can&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s actually an impediment; that goes against everything I&#8217;ve seen and been taught.  That someone with lots of low-budget credits is worse off than someone who&#8217;s only done community theater and a walk-on role at <i>Law and Order</i>&#8230; no.  I&#8217;m sorry, but that&#8217;s just wrong.  Casting directors want to see credits, to the extent that actors without many other credits even list <i>student films</i> on their resumes.  There&#8217;s no way that having lots of B-movie credits would actually be a hindrance.</p>
<p>In Tiffany Shepis&#8217; case, for what it&#8217;s worth, her IMDb page mentions the following quote: &#8220;I go after parts in horror films &#8217;cause I have the most fun shooting them. I mean, wouldn&#8217;t you rather be covered in blood fighting some fucker with an axe than doing some lame romantic comedy?&#8221;  So it&#8217;s entirely possible that she&#8217;s continuing to work in such movies out of a choice on her part.  Certainly, according to her IMDb credits, she&#8217;s doing an impressive number of movies per year (twenty-one movies in 2009?  Yow!), enough that, low-budget or not, she&#8217;s definitely making a decent living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
